Growing in Soil Vs Hydroponic

To the average reader and citizen of the nation, a lack of recognition surrounds the dynamics of plant growth as well as the fact that it is not as simple as putting some seeds into soil and watering it occasionally. Realistically, there are a handful of growth methodologies that have garnered the attention of well-versed gardeners and farmers; of these, soil growth and hydroponics have become the two most dominant. Rather than discuss the differences of the two on a wide-scale, it is imperative that the reader comprehend the concepts behind the two growing methods prior to alluding to which method is beneficial for different types of growers.

First and foremost, one should recognize that growth through the implementation of soil tends to be more beneficial for gardeners lacking the necessary time to continuously check-up on the plants. Additionally, some other commonly noted positives in soil growth relate back to the yield of the plant and the fact that the product of growth maintains a stronger and more visible taste in the end of the cycle. Growing in soil, generally, tends to be more risk averse and will consequently attract newer growers who lack sufficient experience in the plant growth as a whole. While the notion of natural versus unnatural growth tends to come down entirely to personal opinion and feelings of the grower, it is still important to note that soil growth is an entirely natural route of plant growth whereas hydroponics has often been referred to as more of a "factory" style. With recognition of the previous pros in soil growth, one should realize that arguably the largest positive revolves around the ability for soil growth to occur entirely outside; thus, the grower can establish a cheaper setup due to the accessibility to natural light and nutrients.

While soil growth has a handful of positive connotations to it, hydroponics has often been referred to as the growth methodology of the future. As a route to plant growth, hydroponics in regards to our purpose will be referring to the medium of growth incorporating a water reservoir in addition to a medium that is not soil. As a generality, growers pursuing a hydroponics route can immediately recognize the minimized presence of pests whilst simultaneously garnering a faster growth with larger overall yields of the desired crop. Unfortunately, those pursuing this route of growth tend to require a larger base of capital investment. With this increased capital, growers will similarly have an increased time investment as hydroponic growth tends to require more attention and direct action from the individual. Having noted the two aforementioned routes of growth and the overarching positives coming from them, it is important to reach some element of conclusion. Similar to virtually every other article we have posted, the ultimate conclusion lies in the hands of the grower. If you are a new grower without a significant amount of time to invest into the entire process, most would recommend the use of soil growth as the best alternative. On the other hand, if you're an investor with access to a decent amount of capital and have a focal point on mass production with a lack of regard for the extent to which the yield tastes "better", I would argue that you are better off pursuing a hydroponic growth setup.

Given these options, if you wish to know the differences between growing with Organic, or Synthetic nutrients visit this blog! - Organic Vs Synthetic